Roger Federer.? - roger federer lamblyopia
If I am to say that Roger Federer the best tennis player of all time, as you? You do not agree with it?
If I am to say that Roger Federer the best tennis player in my time, like you? You do not agree with it?
Friday, December 4, 2009
Roger Federer Lamblyopia Roger Federer.?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Well ... best player of his time ... This will attract attention and debate here and there ... People say ... People say ... People say he has never won French .. . People say that progress is being played in the technology of today's game is always easy to algae and wood bats can ...
The problem with this person as "the greatest of all time, that the time the game had changed soo much ... Technological advances have changed soo much game ... wooden bat the bat today announced that it has gel in their frames.. .
all cotton-white to today ClimaCool and Dri-FIT ...
the best player of this era ... I agree ... He is No. 1 for no good reason has been ... because everyone loves ... because it is damn good
are required to be no.1 then just a great player ... FedEx is the epitome of a champion ... How well ... the amount of charity work that he did not for the sport ... one of the best ambassadors in my opinion,
There is a certain grace AbuIf the manner in which he plays ... the amount of power and control ... and never forget to keep FedEx mental strength and ability, always cool
Benefits it has collected in his 3 years as champion is still unmatched by the other masters in the past ...
best player ... Way to go
best player now ... no doubt ...
From now on, I would say that Federer is not the best. Sampras is still in front of him, but could end the career of Roger to change. It is the dominant player of this era, of course, with ten Grand Slam to date. Although some criticize his lack of success in French, I do not remember that Sampras. But I still think Federer is the greatest of all time now, but with a little time.
Federer # 1 Without a doubt.
Federer # 1 Without a doubt.
Roger is the complete package. Despite not winning on the sand and reached the final of the Grand Slams.
a case of Pete Sampras with 14 Slams. But Roger has a speedy recovery. Roger reached to 15, then you have my vote. But now, Pete Sampras!
Roger is the complete package. Despite not winning on the sand and reached the final of the Grand Slams.
a case of Pete Sampras with 14 Slams. But Roger has a speedy recovery. Roger reached to 15, then you have my vote. But now, Pete Sampras!
... 100% agree man of 9 consecutive victories in Grand Slam finals and has 52 consecutive matches won on grass ... thats great numbers, and ensure consistent results
is the size of my friend
But people will not accept that until we Nadal on clay
Roger is definitely the best player in my time, but I'm not sure whether it is better than Pete Sampras when Pete was old Roger
Post a Comment