Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Instant Oatmeal As Healthy As Steel Cut Is Instant Steel-cut Oatmeal Less Healthy/nutritious Than Traditionally Cooked Stove-top Steel-cut?

Is instant steel-cut oatmeal less healthy/nutritious than traditionally cooked stove-top steel-cut? - instant oatmeal as healthy as steel cut

So here's the deal:

I have recently bought instant McCann Steel Cut Oats, and I wonder about the nutritional differences between the direct and regular oven. If you have not yet seen, immediately comes the cutting of steel in the various packages and "cooked") by just adding boiling water to oatmeal at a time (IE Quakers.

When asked about was instant-oatmeal or stove told my doctor there was no significant difference in the diet, but cut as the main source of grain steel health certificate can not seem to be on this earth to instant thin as nutritious.

Can I find more information about this, so any help is welcome!

1 comments:

Holly said...

The reasons for the consumers of steel cut oats instead of rolled oats (apart from the fact that the former is actually taste good), the low glycemic index. I understand that in the category of rolled oats, it is better to eat a variety of traditional cuisine, and not the time to strengthen in the fiber stress and a lower glycemic index. Although I do not understand exactly how steel-cut oats are processed and how the glycemic index is affected by processing, it is assumed that the old steel cut oats better raw.

Always prepare steel cut oats 4-6 portions of both service and warm, avoid if necessary, that to wait 30 minutes to cook. My basic rule: the smaller the treatment for all foods that are better for me.

Post a Comment